GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF POVERTY
The Poverty Profile study shows that poverty rate is higher in rural settlements than in urban settlements. Poverty in urban areas is considerably less with a poverty incidence of 27.1 percent compared to 34.9 percent in rural areas. At the urban level, the incidence of poverty is lower in Ulaanbaatar than in provincial centers. In rural areas, soum centers are less poor than large cities.POVERTY TRENDS
The poverty incidence slightly dropped in some regions of Mongolia from 2014 to 2016, according to the study results. The share of the poor in Khangai region has shown a decrease of 1.3 percentage points compared to the year 2014, while it remains higher than other regions. The share of the poor in the West has decreased by 1.7 percentage points, the Central region by 2.1 percentage points, and the Eastern region decreased by 0.1 percentage points from the two preceding years.WELFARE PROFILE
More striking differences are observed in the consumption between poor and non-poor. The average consumption of the non-poor is higher by three times than the average consumption of the poor and the poor on average consumes almost twice as less food as the non-poor. The share of food consumption of the poor is higher to their total consumption, making up 42.3 percent of their consumption. The wealthier population’s average education expenditure is higher by five times than the poor, while the non-poor population has seven folds higher average health expenditures. The mean heating expenditures and spending on clothing of the non-poor are much higher than that of the poor, but the poor’s expenditure is proportionately higher. The wealthier population devotes four times higher expenditure on transportation and communication than the poor.AROUND 1.3 MILLION PEOPLE HAVE LOANS
A spokesperson for NSO reported on Tuesday that 42.2 percent of the total population, approximately 1.3 million people, has loans. In particular, 36.9 percent of loan holders are reported to have taken out salary loans, 21.3 percent have herder’s loans, 20.6 percent have pension loans, nine percent have household consumption loans, 3.4 percent have mortgage loans, 2.8 percent have business loans, and 16.4 percent have other types of loans.HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION
The incidence of poverty monotonically increases with household size. This is hardly surprising when per capita consumption is used as a welfare indicator, which implicitly assumes consumption is shared equally among household members. According to the survey, the probability of being poor is about three percent if a single person lives in a household, while in households with two members the probability of being poor increases to seven percent. Such households reportedly make up 14 percent of the total population and three percent of the poor. The poverty incidence in the average size households of three to five members is about 15 to 39 percent. Such households make up 66 percent of the total population and 61 percent of the poor. In contrast, about 49 percent of households with six members, and more than half of those households with seven or more members are poor. They represent only 17 percent of the total population, but make up 29 percent of the poor population. The extreme poor tend to live in households with an average size of eight or more persons, where 68 percent of such household members are living below the poverty line. Such households make up four percent of the total population and eight percent of the poor, the Poverty Profile 2016 report read.